I was awakened by a text message this morning around 7:30 am, which reminded me of one of the most distinctive cultural differences between my life here and the one I lead in Urbana: the people I work with, and most people in general in Durban, get up early for work. The people I work with would never think it was too early to call or message me at 7am. This has been a definite adjustment to my usual work/sleep patterns. Today I was at the Killie Campbell Africana Library doing more research and found am amazing report from ten years ago that I can use to connect to the programs advocated for "Bantu" Education that I posted about a week ago. As recently as a decade ago, the SA government expressed an interest in "exploiting" culture (the actual word used in the report) in national and global markets in order to improve the economy.
In the afternoon I stopped by Musgrave Centre to buy supplies for my research trip on Saturday: I bought another memory card for my digital camera, batteries for my digital audio recorder, and a big box of Grand-Pa Hoofpynpoeiers (in English: Grand-Pa Headache Powder). The air pressure today has been wreaking havoc with my head - it finally started raining an hour ago - so I needed to buy some headache medicine. Headache powder is popular here - my friend K in Urbana first introduced it to me - and it works faster than ingesting a pill. The powder comes in a little folded wax-paper packet and you either mix it with water or just chuck it all in your mouth and swallow it down quickly.
Two variables regarding Saturday's trip were happily cleared up today: first, we confirmed that our group will stay a second week in Nelspruit (Mpumalanga province). The first week, then, will be the "Democracy" workshop with the Parliamentary Millennium Project and the second, less funded/more "grassroots" week will be the "History" workshop with only Create Africa South sponsoring the workshop. Also, my contact in South Africa's Parliament confirmed to me that when we finally meet on Saturday she can bring me past reports/paperwork related to their end of the project's collaboration and also DVDS of footage recorded during the first three workshops from this year. This is wonderful news for me - having the project coordinator from Parliament furnishing materials helps remove part of the "guesswork" from my research and will ensure I can analyze the motivations for the Parliamentary Millennium Quilt Project beyond the small blurb on their website.
Below I've included my most recent formulation of what my research will lead to in terms of my dissertation. For now its focus excludes the research I have been doing on economic craft programs for "marginalized" groups - something that I will continue to examine, but that may have to form another project besides my dissertation.
----------------------------
I am currently in Durban, South Africa conducting fieldwork in the area (participant observation and interviews) and archival research at the Killie Campbell Africana Library (University of KwaZulu-Natal). My dissertation is in its prewriting/research stage and I will submit a complete prospectus draft to my advisor in late March. It was imperative for me to begin field research before completing my prospectus so I can ethically attend to the interview subjects and local environment in which I have situated myself over the next few months. My dissertation, “Crafting Democratic Participation: Amazwi Abesifazane, South Africa’s Parliamentary Millennium Project, and Craft Literacy,” examines cloth production workshops Create Africa South (CAS) sponsors for South African women to compose embroidered cloths that recount past history and present conceptions of democracy. CAS began these weeklong craft workshops, entitled “Amazwi Abesifazane” (“Voices of Women”), in 2000 to collect personal histories from women, a majority of whom are considered marginalized because they are “Black” or “Coloured,” informal laborers, or possess little alphabetic literacy. During the workshop each participant composes an oral narrative and embroidered panel that depicts the themes explored in her narrative. CAS then takes the woman’s photograph and frames these three components together for exhibition within South Africa, internationally, and online. Over the past year, CAS has collaborated with the Parliament of South Africa’s Millennium Project (PMP), which has prompted a shift in the cloths’ subjects from recounting history to representing conceptions of democracy. When the PMP has collected cloths from women in all nine provinces of South Africa, they will be exhibited and discussed in Parliament.
During my time here, I will participate in three workshops that will form the central case studies for my dissertation. The first, funded and led by PMP organizers, will be held in the Mpumalanga province (scheduled from March 17-21 in Nelspruit) with a democracy focus and the second will be funded and led by CAS organizers and occur in the same province the following week with a broader history focus. The third workshop will be held here in the metropolitan Durban area in April – it is one that I have been in the process of coordinating since arriving here through contacts I have established in the Indian community and it will be a workshop with a group of ethnic Indian women in the area. If successful, this last workshop would foster the production of the first South African Indian history cloths for the Amazwi archive. I will revisit Durban, Cape Town, and Nelspruit during the Spring 2009 term to trace the impact of these workshops and the cloths upon the participants involved (including workshop participants, CAS organizers, and PMP coordinators), as well as their larger dissemination to local, governmental, national, and international audiences. Returning in person will be vital for me to reestablish and interview the personal contacts I have made while I have been here, as issues of language, context, and technological access prohibit me from completing follow up from a distance. I may still face difficulty in relocating some workshop participants, as informal settlement residents often lack stable housing and employment options.
While I cannot make direct claims about the workshops that will serve as my case studies before their occurrence, I can situate them within the core concepts of democratic participation and craft literacy that I draw from the field of Rhetoric and Composition. My dissertation contributes to the field’s scholarship on the constitution of democratic citizens, democratic participation, and the link of citizenship and participation to literate practices. I productively challenge and further this tradition of scholarship to consider how neoliberal globalization, in its privatization of services through NGOs and expansion of inequalities, influence the construction of particular forms of citizenship and participation in the “Global South.” Specifically, I consider how the execution of these local workshops, the sewing activities they foster (which may conventionally be considered pre- or non-political), and the circulation of cloths function as forms of democratic participation within a global network of rhetorical exchange. By observing and participating in the workshops, I can consider how participants identify themselves and how workshop coordinators communicate constitutive discourses that, as Barbara Cruikshank argues, “contribute to solidifying what is possible to think, say, do, and be democratically.” I anticipate my experience with three different versions of the cloth production workshop – particularly in their differences in governmental and NGO coordination, racial and ethnic identifications, and subject focus – will contribute to a nuanced analysis of the core concepts of democratic participation and craft literacy that I explore.
When I analyze the composition of the cloths as a literate modality – I consider them as a form of “craft literacy” and reference key, past critical definitions of the concept, including Eric Havelock’s identification of “craft literacy” as a moment “in which the public inscription is composed as a source of referral for officials” and Jonathan Moyo’s use of the term to refer to the design of bureaucratic structures. At the same time, I expand the term to consider the material/visual/haptic literate practices of a craft literacy that draws upon handicraft traditions as a modality of literate expression. Havelock’s understanding of craft literacy may account for the CAS/PMP collaboration – where the cloths are seemingly produced as direct referrals to Parliament officials - but the second and third workshops evade this strict conception, with their lack of a direct conduit to official or bureaucratic networks. Ultimately, I identify craft literacy as a form of democratic participation, but one that may problematically be opened up primarily for citizens of the “global South.” In the sections on craft literacy and the conclusion of my dissertation, I will work through this claim when I relate the CAS cloths to forms of democratic craft production that have originated in the United States, including the NAMES Project AIDS Memorial Quilt and the Clothesline Project, which have functioned within public networks of rhetoric to influence popular and governmental response to human rights issues.
Recent Comments